Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled the plaintiffs failed to show sufficient harm, stating concerns like declining attendance were too speculative.
The policy reversed a Biden-era rule limiting enforcement near sensitive locations, including churches and schools. Although churches claimed the policy led to empty pews, the judge said broader immigration actions could be to blame.
The ruling focused on the plaintiffs’ lack of legal standing, not the policy’s legality. In contrast, a Maryland judge blocked similar enforcement near certain religious sites.
Meanwhile, in Boston, an ICE agent was held in contempt for arresting a suspect during trial proceedings. The case has fueled tensions in sanctuary cities like Boston, where officials resist federal immigration efforts.
